You are here
Three in every four extremely hot days linked to climate change
Primary tabs
Fri, 2015-05-01 22:47 — Maeryn Obley
Image: Three out of four hot days could be due to climate change (Image: Guy Corbishley/Getty)
newscientist.com - April 28th 2015 - Aviva Rutkin
If climate change was a game, we'd have racked up quite a score. A fresh study suggests that humans are responsible for a hefty number of today's extreme hot days and rainstorms.
Weather extremes, such as a Russian heatwave in 2010 and a drought in Texas in 2011, have been blamed on climate change before – but the attribution of individual events to it is still hotly debated.
Country / Region Tags:
General Topic Tags:
Problem, Solution, SitRep, or ?:
Groups this Group Post belongs to:
Comments
Anthropogenic - heavy-precipitation & high-temperature extremes
Documentation - Research Study in support of the above article . . .
Anthropogenic contribution to global occurrence of heavy-precipitation and high-temperature extremes
Climate change includes not only changes in mean climate but also in weather extremes. For a few prominent heatwaves and heavy precipitation events a human contribution to their occurrence has been demonstrated1, 2, 3, 4, 5. Here we apply a similar framework but estimate what fraction of all globally occurring heavy precipitation and hot extremes is attributable to warming. We show that at the present-day warming of 0.85 °C about 18% of the moderate daily precipitation extremes over land are attributable to the observed temperature increase since pre-industrial times, which in turn primarily results from human influence6. For 2 °C of warming the fraction of precipitation extremes attributable to human influence rises to about 40%. Likewise, today about 75% of the moderate daily hot extremes over land are attributable to warming. It is the most rare and extreme events for which the largest fraction is anthropogenic, and that contribution increases nonlinearly with further warming. The approach introduced here is robust owing to its global perspective, less sensitive to model biases than alternative methods and informative for mitigation policy, and thereby complementary to single-event attribution. Combined with information on vulnerability and exposure, it serves as a scientific basis for assessment of global risk from extreme weather, the discussion of mitigation targets, and liability considerations.
(CLICK HERE FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION)